
Public opinion already against City
For three years the 115 charges have shadowed every discussion about Manchester City. Whether in the background or foreground you cannot talk about Pep Guardiola trebles or Premier League titles without the charges lurking. The topic thrives on sensationalism with outcomes that could reshape English football yet almost nobody knows the details beyond the Premier League’s basic February 2023 statement.
City have protested innocence from day one but nobody knows their evidence apart from publicly available audited accounts. The Premier League’s case remains secret so most people jump to conclusions without facts. When City win trophies – and they have won plenty since the charges – it fuels those who want to believe everything is tainted and punishment is coming.
City could face severe sanctions but if cleared the Premier League might suffer more. Serious accusations without proof would damage the league’s credibility. No fine for non-compliance would erase the embarrassment.
Business world shows no fear
More people want City punished and it is easier to imagine them relegated selling Haaland and Foden than executives resigning. Coverage often reflects this bias ignoring balanced views.
A recent podcast with former Liverpool Chelsea and Villa executive Christian Purslow discussed potential sanctions and appeals. His point about major sponsors BYD and Revolut endorsing City despite the case went largely unreported.
Purslow said these are huge endorsements from major businesses wanting association with City. If Liverpool Spurs or Chelsea CEOs got similar offers they would jump at them. This suggests the business community sees no long-term risk from the undetermined legal case.
Case drags on with hardened opinions
The hearing in 2024 involved millions in legal fees from both sides. The unusual length for three independent judges to rule shows complexity. While waiting opinions harden through speculation and selective information.
Guardiola said years ago City were already condemned without defence. Recent developments have only strengthened that view in public eyes. City are unlikely to win in the court of public opinion even if cleared.
They must hope the panel delivers a strong verdict in their favour. Until then the shadow remains with many ready to ignore any positive outcome and keep demanding punishment.